It is aimed to address the role of government and its stand in an Islamic economic system by using economic theories and on the basis of public theory of Islamic state. It is proved that while the first principle in Islam is to prevent government intervention but the opposite will be the case because of economic and jurisprudential reasons to provide the purposes of Islam in an economic life.Therefore a different pattern has been designed for the role of government in economy based on free activity and the economic responsibility of people and also the responsible intervention of government in an Islamic system framework in comparison with other economic systems.

In societies where individuals have rights and duties, whenever human rights and freedoms are violated or restricted, civic rights necessitate that individuals protest against the existing situation. Therefore, it is essential to establish this right, and the authorities must take action to ensure that such civil protests have a legal basis. In this paper, we aim to demonstrate the existence of the right to protest and assemble in Islamic jurisprudence, Iranian law, and international documents. Using a library-based method and historical documents alongside studies in public law and political science, we will highlight the shortcomings of these types of gatherings, emphasizing the distinction between civil protest and civil disobedience. Accordingly, we propose the drafting of a comprehensive law regarding gatherings that recognizes the principle of protest while addressing the potential concerns of those opposed to such gatherings. This would ensure the right of citizens to protest, particularly against administrative decisions, and prevent the denial or restriction of the right to protest under the pretext of misuse of gatherings. It seems that the approval and implementation of this law would be a significant step in the development of civic rights and the institutionalization of citizens' rights, as well as a major advancement in holding officials accountable. The recent tragic events in the country also call for the swift enactment of such laws.

One of the signs of the expanse of Islamic studies is the increase in the number of Muslims which with other influential factors has led to the creation of numerous Islamic countries. The countries of this region have been confronted by the danger of terrorism for years and suffered so many damages by them. Regarding vast and multilateral attacks and in the other hand the need of these countries for the protection of the Islamic Republic of Iran, these protections have been done in different forms for years. In this article we have investigated the way Iran is protecting these countries with Islamic jurisprudence approach and then in three dimensions, we have shown that according to accepted jurisprudential principles, the protection of Islamic countries is in accordance with Islamic rules. Authors believe that in the military dimension, the principle of the protection of the oppressed and the arguments that imply the preservation of Islam, both require military support. In the financial aspect, the principle of Taalif ol Gholub ( getting hearts close), the contribution of the Way of Allah from Zakat, and the rule of "Beatles of the Prophet Muhammad" reflect the need for financial support from the countries of the region. On the other hand, the proof of the necessity of paying attention to the affairs of the Muslims, the principle of the ritual bow and the principle of the negation of the mustache, are also absolute supportive (in any form). The research method in this article is descriptive-analytical and the data collection tool is the use of library resources by referring to the interpretative, narrative and jurisprudential sources.

Throughout history, government officials and important personalities have always been at risk. The main question of this research is "Is the protection of officials and personalities accepted in Islam"? To answer this question, we referred to the main sources of Islam and this main question was answered by a jurisprudential method. In this study, two different categories of evidence were found,Arguments that agree with and support the protection of personalities and officials in Islam, and arguments that seem to conflict with protection. Following various works and examining the evidence, the result of this research was that protection in Islam is a certain and accepted thing,However, according to the desirable characteristics of the Islamic ruler, the desirable fraternal relations in the community of faith and the beliefs of the believer, conditions and conditions must be set for it. In the meantime, the prohibition of intentional destruction and the order to guard in the prayer of fear are the most important arguments in favor of guarding in Islam. We also see in the biography of the Prophet (PBUH) that he was protected in wars and many bodyguards have been mentioned for him throughout history. Low identification of security in Islam can lead us to the right model for today's complex world.

This paper aims primarily to study the concept and nature of neutrality in Islamic political philosophy. Although neutrality is primarily in conflict with the religious government, which claims to fulfill the teachings of a particular religion, but the other side of the coin is that, this concept is debatable in aspects of Islamic political philosophy. One of these aspects is the existence of different minorities within the political community who are considered citizens and want the government to treat the citizens equally and neutrally towards all citizens. On the other hand, how Islamic political philosophy deals with the challenges that have led to neutrality in Western countries can further reveal the strengths and weaknesses of Islamic political philosophy. The author will examine this from the perspective of transcendental political philosophy. In this regard, the issues that in the minds of transcendental philosophers can help to clarify neutrality are examined and analyzed. The concept of right and good, human self-determination, and dealing with the political institutions of the community are among the most important topics of neutrality in Western political thought. In transcendental philosophy, these issues will be discussed around topics such as the type of look at human, society, religion, and universe. Accordingly, the most important issue of the present paper is what are the claims of the political neutrality and how can this issue be coped with from the perspective of Islamic political philosophy?

The present article does an investigation into responsibility of Islamic government in formal education using exertive (Ijtihad-based) method ordinary in Shiite jurisprudence. In fact, the author has multidimensionally studied responsibility of Islamic government in formal education, and finally provided his viewpoint. Following this study, it can be determined that there are various viewpoints regarding the role Islamic government can play in formal education. Some believe that education is mainly parents' responsibility and Islamic government only intervenes in necessary conditions so that drawbacks can be compensated and potential gaps can be filled, while others believe that such responsibility is burden of the government and parents must cooperate with the government. Alongside of these two standpoints, the author posits that education, in addition to a personal right, can be considered as a social necessity. Hence, based on jurisprudential foundations, Islamic government is main responsible of education, here formal education, which humans' life system is highly dependent upon it.

This study aimed to determine whether a violation of the laws and regulations of the Islamic state which has been legally called crime is always considered a sin and the person who committed it is unfaithful according to religious law and shall be punished on the day of resurrection or is it merely "social and civil offenses" that are punishable by law. Investigating various principles about the nature of government orders and laws of Islamic state provides different answers to this question. This paper referred to three principles and outcomes as well as related verses and narrations. Verses and narrations imply that violation of religious laws of Sharia and the government orders of the Prophet and Shia's Imams and also the laws of the legitimate religious government during the period of major occultation is known as a sin, provided that such a violation being accounted as disobedience of God, the Prophet and the Shia Imams. But taking into account the violation of conventional laws such as those enacted in other countries to regulate social relations as sin is questionable, unless violation of these laws includes disturbing social system, harming to others and opposing religious government.

Different views have been presented about the kind of interaction between the clerics and Islamic government. One of them is that the clerics are at the service of and subject to Islamic government and that it is incumbent on all people, including the clerics, to obey all its institutions as part of their religious duty towards the Islamic government. Another view is that Islamic government should be governed by the clerics and that in the Islamic government which is the conduct for implementing divine bounds it is the religious scholars and religious authorities who take this responsibility. According to this view, the Islamic government has to be headed by the clerics as religious leaders. Another view which principally rejects the idea of the relationship between religion and politics and distinguishes the presence and mission of the clerics form those of the government. Finally, there is a view that backs the idea of the relationship between religion and politics, but ignores the relationship between the clerics and government and stresses the idea of setting up an Islamic government but without the clerics. Each one of these views originates from the way its advocates perceive such things like the clerics and Islamic government, the relationship between religion and society, Islam and government, Islam and the clerics, the clerics and society, etc.Expounding the concepts and principles of the subject matter of this topic and investigating the different views about it, the present paper investigates and provides a model which is consistent with the political philosophy of Islam and identical to the political thought of Imam Khomeini, the founder of the Islamic Republic system.